5th
September, 2017
To:
Cressida Dick, Metropolitan
Police Commissioner
Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London
Amber Rudd, Home Secretary
Lesley Longstone, IPCC Chief Executive
Norman Lamb, MP North Norfolk
Peter Heaton-Jones, MP North Devon
Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London
Amber Rudd, Home Secretary
Lesley Longstone, IPCC Chief Executive
Norman Lamb, MP North Norfolk
Peter Heaton-Jones, MP North Devon
CC: Various
interested MPs, media, lawyers, officials, the Internet (published as
a blog).
Re:
Demonstrable criminal corruption by SCU (Serious Crimes Unit,
Charring Cross, London)
Demand
to preserve evidence alleged to be in police files
Formal
request to have arrest record and biometric data
deleted
Refs: 6522036/16 and 6504541/17
Refs: 6522036/16 and 6504541/17
Dear
Ms Dick
Forgive my acidity. This letter is being published prominently online as a blog. Please do not simply pass this to the Directorate of Professional Standards Unit or suggest I complain (again) to the IPCC, as this has proven futile (as I expected given the massive adverse publicity against them both). I will be suing you, when I am able, unless the matter can be resolved. I can not get Legal Aid because of a property I own which I can never sell or live in, and the Pro Bono Unit have no money due to government cuts. No win no pay lawyers are interested only in other types of (easier) cases, but I will get justice against the Metropolitan Police and certain officers one day for their acts of corruption against me, I vow.
I will demonstrate clear criminal corruption by the SCU, most easiest proven regarding 6522036/16 by an alleged letter sent to me by them, which I never received and which “mysteriously” is not in the police file. This alleged letter and my non-response was the justification for my arrest and overnight detention for a total unlawful nonsense. I have tried everything, including the IPCC and a Freedom of Information request to get a copy of this ghostly letter, along with any and all related postal information (proof of sending, proof of delivery, proof of return, etc.) without success. I say that the letter does not exist. I say the SCU are liars and thereby criminally corrupt. I say you will be aiding and abetting their corruption, perverting the course of justice, unless you order a copy be provided to me, or act against the officers involved in its absence.
That is not the only aspect of 6522036/16 that demonstrates corruption by the SCU in this “investigation” (resulting in a nonsense Statutory Harassment Warning Notice against me). Another main aspect is the fact your officers did not follow Home Office Counting Rules in that the complaint, made in London against me, should have been passed to Norfolk Constabulary where I then lived and was documented accordingly. Your officers using the “We did not know” defence trying to put their omissions into the realm of professional negligence for which incredibly you can not be sued. But they did know my address; they let slip the fact they had researched the fact I bought a car registered to that address a few day before the arrest warrant was issued.
Finally, regarding 6522036/16, your officers knew too well that they did not have jurisdiction and there was absolutely no hope of a criminal conviction or even charge because I was in Spain when the alleged “harassment” was committed. Both the complainant and the officers knew this fact very well, though of course they used the “We did not know” defence yet again. Well, if they did not know, they must be total imbeciles given my emails clearly came from Spain (the email header information shows where I was). But, of course, whereas they may well be imbeciles, this is a matter of more lies, more corruption, as my movements were reported to them by UK Border Control, so the SCU 100% knew they were acting outside their jurisdiction.
It is clear the SCU abused 6522036/16 as a corrupt favour to the complainant, an FCO manager I caught drinking champagne at a West End bar while on duty, instead of helping my abused children stuck in Portugal without me. And it is clear the complaint against me was made to try and shut me up, to stop me from bringing this FCO manager's own corruption (abuse of public office / power) into the public domain, like bully boy police in a third world country or Nazi Germany. What makes it worse is that the SCU knew I was a documented human rights victim who had several nervous breakdowns and also had recently tried to take my own life, who was fleeing to the UK as a refugee. When I was arrested in front of my already terrified children and also family members who had flown from Australia to comfort us, you made an enemy out of me, well and truly. Not least as the SCU did not inform Norfolk Constabulary that I was a vulnerable person, no doubt again to cloud their false legitimacy even though their callous acts risked my life.
Of course, your police complaints section did everything to sweep the facts under the carpet, and the IPCC simply endorsed their “We did not know nonsense defence”; the only thing the IPCC gave me was an admission that things should have been done differently, which clearly means I have have a civil case against you once I am able.
And so to 6504541/17, and yet more corruption by the SCU. 6504541/17 is my complaint against the FCO manager involved. I did everything I could to have another department investigate, but of course it went to the SCU, and of course they refused to even interview the FCO manager over my complaints. Most easy to prove corruption again is the fact the “investigating” officer said he could not investigate the allegation of the manager drinking champagne miles away from her office during office hours / while on duty because the evidence I provided, a photograph of her drinking champagne at the bar with friends on that day was not “verified”. What a sick joke. The photograph was verified by the FCO manager in her complaint against me; the verification was in police file 6522036/16. When I told them this, did it change anything? Of course not; go to the IPCC if you want to complain (no thanks, they are a total waste of time).
Ms Dick, I say the above is clear justification for a criminal investigation against the officers involved, not only for corruption, but terrorism / acts of torture as defined by the United Nations Convention against Torture. If you do not so comply, if you do not at the very least provide the above ghostly (non-existent) police letter to me or take the officers involved to task (about both 6522036/16 and 6504541/17) and delete my arrest / biometric records, I will hold you as corrupt and a terrorist too.
Again, I hope these matters can be resolved amicably. If not, with all due respect, you are my and the general public's enemy. At the every least, please ensure the “ghostly” letter (if it exists) is kept safe / preserved as evidence; I will claim it a deliberate / corrupt police act / lie if you claim it exists / existed but somehow it got destroyed or lost.
Yours sincerely
Forgive my acidity. This letter is being published prominently online as a blog. Please do not simply pass this to the Directorate of Professional Standards Unit or suggest I complain (again) to the IPCC, as this has proven futile (as I expected given the massive adverse publicity against them both). I will be suing you, when I am able, unless the matter can be resolved. I can not get Legal Aid because of a property I own which I can never sell or live in, and the Pro Bono Unit have no money due to government cuts. No win no pay lawyers are interested only in other types of (easier) cases, but I will get justice against the Metropolitan Police and certain officers one day for their acts of corruption against me, I vow.
I will demonstrate clear criminal corruption by the SCU, most easiest proven regarding 6522036/16 by an alleged letter sent to me by them, which I never received and which “mysteriously” is not in the police file. This alleged letter and my non-response was the justification for my arrest and overnight detention for a total unlawful nonsense. I have tried everything, including the IPCC and a Freedom of Information request to get a copy of this ghostly letter, along with any and all related postal information (proof of sending, proof of delivery, proof of return, etc.) without success. I say that the letter does not exist. I say the SCU are liars and thereby criminally corrupt. I say you will be aiding and abetting their corruption, perverting the course of justice, unless you order a copy be provided to me, or act against the officers involved in its absence.
That is not the only aspect of 6522036/16 that demonstrates corruption by the SCU in this “investigation” (resulting in a nonsense Statutory Harassment Warning Notice against me). Another main aspect is the fact your officers did not follow Home Office Counting Rules in that the complaint, made in London against me, should have been passed to Norfolk Constabulary where I then lived and was documented accordingly. Your officers using the “We did not know” defence trying to put their omissions into the realm of professional negligence for which incredibly you can not be sued. But they did know my address; they let slip the fact they had researched the fact I bought a car registered to that address a few day before the arrest warrant was issued.
Finally, regarding 6522036/16, your officers knew too well that they did not have jurisdiction and there was absolutely no hope of a criminal conviction or even charge because I was in Spain when the alleged “harassment” was committed. Both the complainant and the officers knew this fact very well, though of course they used the “We did not know” defence yet again. Well, if they did not know, they must be total imbeciles given my emails clearly came from Spain (the email header information shows where I was). But, of course, whereas they may well be imbeciles, this is a matter of more lies, more corruption, as my movements were reported to them by UK Border Control, so the SCU 100% knew they were acting outside their jurisdiction.
It is clear the SCU abused 6522036/16 as a corrupt favour to the complainant, an FCO manager I caught drinking champagne at a West End bar while on duty, instead of helping my abused children stuck in Portugal without me. And it is clear the complaint against me was made to try and shut me up, to stop me from bringing this FCO manager's own corruption (abuse of public office / power) into the public domain, like bully boy police in a third world country or Nazi Germany. What makes it worse is that the SCU knew I was a documented human rights victim who had several nervous breakdowns and also had recently tried to take my own life, who was fleeing to the UK as a refugee. When I was arrested in front of my already terrified children and also family members who had flown from Australia to comfort us, you made an enemy out of me, well and truly. Not least as the SCU did not inform Norfolk Constabulary that I was a vulnerable person, no doubt again to cloud their false legitimacy even though their callous acts risked my life.
Of course, your police complaints section did everything to sweep the facts under the carpet, and the IPCC simply endorsed their “We did not know nonsense defence”; the only thing the IPCC gave me was an admission that things should have been done differently, which clearly means I have have a civil case against you once I am able.
And so to 6504541/17, and yet more corruption by the SCU. 6504541/17 is my complaint against the FCO manager involved. I did everything I could to have another department investigate, but of course it went to the SCU, and of course they refused to even interview the FCO manager over my complaints. Most easy to prove corruption again is the fact the “investigating” officer said he could not investigate the allegation of the manager drinking champagne miles away from her office during office hours / while on duty because the evidence I provided, a photograph of her drinking champagne at the bar with friends on that day was not “verified”. What a sick joke. The photograph was verified by the FCO manager in her complaint against me; the verification was in police file 6522036/16. When I told them this, did it change anything? Of course not; go to the IPCC if you want to complain (no thanks, they are a total waste of time).
Ms Dick, I say the above is clear justification for a criminal investigation against the officers involved, not only for corruption, but terrorism / acts of torture as defined by the United Nations Convention against Torture. If you do not so comply, if you do not at the very least provide the above ghostly (non-existent) police letter to me or take the officers involved to task (about both 6522036/16 and 6504541/17) and delete my arrest / biometric records, I will hold you as corrupt and a terrorist too.
Again, I hope these matters can be resolved amicably. If not, with all due respect, you are my and the general public's enemy. At the every least, please ensure the “ghostly” letter (if it exists) is kept safe / preserved as evidence; I will claim it a deliberate / corrupt police act / lie if you claim it exists / existed but somehow it got destroyed or lost.
Yours sincerely
